4.5 Article

Meta-analysis of vitamin D, calcium and the prevention of breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 469-477

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0593-9

Keywords

Vitamin D; 25(OH)D; 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D; Calcium; Breast cancer; Meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. One Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. National Nature Science Foundation [30870513]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007CB947100]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08391910800]
  5. Food Safety Research Center
  6. Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vitamin D and calcium intake have been suggested to have protective effects against breast cancer; however, the data have been inconclusive. The present meta-analysis examined the overall effects of vitamin D intake, circulating 25(OH) D and 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D levels, and calcium intake on breast cancer risk. Data from 11 studies on vitamin D intake, 7 studies on circulating 25(OH) D levels, 3 studies of circulating 1 alpha,25(OH)(2)D levels, and 15 studies on calcium intake and breast cancer risk were included in this analysis. From the meta-analysis, there was a significant inverse relationship between vitamin D intake and breast cancer risk, with an overall relative risk (RR) of high versus low vitamin D intake for breast cancer of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.85-0.97). The highest quantile of circulating 25(OH) D was found to be associated with a 45% (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38-0.80) decrease in breast cancer when compared with the lowest quantile. No significant association for the circulating 1a, 25(OH)(2)D level and breast cancer was found (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.68-1.44). For calcium, a 19% (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72-0.90) decrease in breast cancer risk was found for those with highest quantile of calcium intake compared to the lowest quantile. These results provide strong evidence that vitamin D and calcium have a chemopreventive effect against breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available