4.5 Article

Divergent Innervation of the Olfactory Bulb by Distinct Raphe Nuclei

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
Volume 523, Issue 5, Pages 805-813

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.23713

Keywords

quantitative image analysis; rAAV; RRIDs: AB_300798; AB_1142794; nlx_153890

Funding

  1. Max-Planck-Society [DFG SPP1392]
  2. Bauer Stiftung
  3. Alexander von Humboldt-foundation
  4. ExcellenzCluster CellNetworks, Germany
  5. Medical Research Council, UK [MC_UP_1202/5]
  6. MRC [MC_UP_1202/5] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1202/5] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. The Francis Crick Institute [10153] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The raphe nuclei provide serotonergic innervation widely in the brain, thought to mediate a variety of neuromodulatory effects. The mammalian olfactory bulb (OB) is a prominent recipient of serotonergic fibers, particularly in the glomerular layer (GL), where they are thought to gate incoming signals from the olfactory nerve. The dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) and the median raphe nucleus (MRN) are known to densely innervate the OB. The majority of such projections are thought to terminate in the GL, but this has not been explicitly tested. We sought to investigate this using recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAV)-mediated expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-synaptophysin targeted specifically to neurons of the DRN or the MRN. With DRN injections, labeled fibers were found mostly in the granule cell layer (GCL), not the GL. Conversely, dense labeling in the GL was observed with MRN injections, suggesting that the source of GL innervation is the MRN, not the DRN, as previously thought. The two raphe nuclei thus give dual innervation within the OB, with distinct innervation patterns. J. Comp. Neurol. 523:805-813, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available