4.2 Article

Fecal indicators and bacterial pathogens in bottled water from Dhaka, Bangladesh

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 97-103

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA MICROBIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822013005000026

Keywords

bottled water; fecal indicator bacteria; quantitative PCR; bacterial pathogens; public health risk

Categories

Funding

  1. Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forty-six bottled water samples representing 16 brands from Dhaka, Bangladesh were tested for the numbers of total coliforms, fecal indicator bacteria (i.e., thermotolerant Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp.) and potential bacterial pathogens (i.e., Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp.). Among the 16 brands tested, 14 (86%), ten (63%) and seven (44%) were positive for total coliforms, E. coli and Enterococcus spp., respectively. Additionally, a further nine (56%), eight (50%), six (37%), and four (25%) brands were PCR positive for A. hydrophila lip, P. aeruginosa ETA, Salmonella spp. invA, and Shigella spp. ipaH genes, respectively. The numbers of bacterial pathogens in bottled water samples ranged from 28 +/- 12 to 600 +/- 45 (A. hydrophila lip gene), 180 +/- 40 to 900 +/- 200 (Salmonella spp. invA gene), 180 +/- 40 to 1,300 +/- 400 (P. aeruginosa ETA gene) genomic units per L of water. Shigella spp. ipaH gene was not quantifiable. Discrepancies were observed in terms of the occurrence of fecal indicators and bacterial pathogens. No correlations were observed between fecal indicators numbers and presence/absence of A. hydrophila lip (p = 0.245), Salmonella spp. invA (p = 0.433), Shigella spp. ipaH gene (p = 0.078), and P. aeruginosa ETA (p = 0.059) genes. Our results suggest that microbiological quality of bottled waters sold in Dhaka, Bangladesh is highly variable. To protect public health, stringent quality control is recommended for the bottled water industry in Bangladesh.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available