4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Specific monoclonal antibodies against IDH1/2 mutations as diagnostic tools for gliomas

Journal

BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 3-11

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10014-014-0202-4

Keywords

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1; Isocitrate dehydrogenase 2; Monoclonal antibody; Mutations; Multi-specific mAb

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. MEXT of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25462242] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2) have been reported in gliomas and other types of tumors, such as acute myeloid leukemias, cartilaginous tumors, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, osteosarcomas, and giant cell tumors of bone. In gliomas, IDH mutations uniformly occur in the functionally critical arginine 132 residue (R132) of IDH1 and arginine 172 residue (R172) of IDH2. IDH1 and IDH2 catalyze the oxidative carboxylation of isocitrate to alpha-ketoglutarate (alpha-KG) in the cytosol and mitochondria, respectively. In contrast, mutated IDH1/2 proteins possess a neomorphic enzymatic function that changes alpha-KG into the oncometabolite, R(-)-2-hydroxyglutarate, resulting in genomic hypermethylation, histone methylation, genetic instability, and malignant transformation. To date, several monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for IDH1/2 mutations such as anti-IDH1-R132H mAbs (clone H09, clone IMab-1, and clone HMab-1) or an anti-IDH1-R132S mAb (clone SMab-1) have been established. Furthermore, one of multi-specific mAbs, MsMab-1, recognizes IDH1 mutants (R132H, R132S, R132G) and IDH2 mutants (R172S, R172G), which are observed in gliomas. Another mAb, MsMab-2, recognizes IDH1-R132L and IDH2-R172M. These IDH1/2 mutation-specific mAbs are useful for the immunohistochemical determination of IDH1/2 mutation-bearing gliomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available