4.3 Review

Mismatch Negativity (MMN) as an Index of Cognitive Dysfunction

Journal

BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 451-466

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-014-0374-6

Keywords

Mismatch negativity (MMN); Clinical application; Neurodevelopmental; Neuropsychiatric; Neurological

Funding

  1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders of the National Institutes of Health [R13DC012029, R01DC004263]
  2. National Science Foundation [1156635]
  3. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [IUT 02-13]
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1156635] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognition is often affected in a variety of neuropsychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental disorders. The neural discriminative response, reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetoencephalographic equivalent (MMNm), has been used as a tool to study a variety of disorders involving auditory cognition. MMN/MMNm is an involuntary brain response to auditory change or, more generally, to pattern regularity violation. For a number of disorders, MMN/MMNm amplitude to sound deviance has been shown to be attenuated or the peak-latency of the component prolonged compared to controls. This general finding suggests that while not serving as a specific marker to any particular disorder, MMN may be useful for understanding factors of cognition in various disorders, and has potential to serve as an indicator of risk. This review presents a brief history of the MMN, followed by a description of how MMN has been used to index auditory processing capability in a range of neuropsychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Finally, we suggest future directions for research to further enhance our understanding of the neural substrate of deviance detection that could lead to improvements in the use of MMN as a clinical tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available