4.6 Article

ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness

Journal

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
Volume 215, Issue 3-4, Pages 209-223

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-010-0287-4

Keywords

fMRI; Meta-analysis; Attractiveness; Trustworthiness; Amygdala

Funding

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [IRTG 1328]
  2. Human Brain Project [R01-MH074457-01A1]
  3. Helmholtz Initiative on Systems-Biology The Human Brain Model
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH074457] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Faces convey a multitude of information in social interaction, among which are trustworthiness and attractiveness. Humans process and evaluate these two dimensions very quickly due to their great adaptive importance. Trustworthiness evaluation is crucial for modulating behavior toward strangers; attractiveness evaluation is a crucial factor for mate selection, possibly providing cues for reproductive success. As both dimensions rapidly guide social behavior, this study tests the hypothesis that both judgments may be subserved by overlapping brain networks. To this end, we conducted an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis on 16 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies pertaining to facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness. Throughout combined, individual, and conjunction analyses on those two facial judgments, we observed consistent maxima in the amygdala which corroborates our initial hypothesis. This finding supports the contemporary paradigm shift extending the amygdala's role from dominantly processing negative emotional stimuli to processing socially relevant ones. We speculate that the amygdala filters sensory information with evolutionarily conserved relevance. Our data suggest that such a role includes not only fight-or-flight decisions but also social behaviors with longer term pay-off schedules, e.g., trustworthiness and attractiveness evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available