4.6 Review

A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation

Journal

BRAIN STIMULATION
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 125-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.007

Keywords

ultrasound; neuromodulation; neuroimaging; brain; treatment

Funding

  1. Woody Wurster NARSAD Distinguished Investigator Award
  2. Focused Ultrasound Surgery Foundation
  3. Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology
  4. Gerald J and Dorothy R Friedman Foundation
  5. Brainsonix Corp.
  6. NIH [DA026109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease, dystonia and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for epilepsy and depression, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of depression, neuromodulation has become increasingly relevant to clinical research. However, these techniques have significant drawbacks (eg, lack of special specificity and depth for the rTMS, and invasiveness and cumbersome maintenance for DBS). This article reviews the background, rationale, and pilot studies to date, using a new brain stimulation method low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation (LIFUP). The ability of ultrasound to be focused noninvasively through the skull anywhere within the brain, together with concurrent imaging (ie, functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]) techniques, may create a role for research and clinical use of LIFUP. This technique is still in preclinical testing and needs to be assessed thoroughly before being advanced to clinical trials. In this study, we review over 50 years of research data on the use of focused ultrasound (FUS) in neuronal tissue and live brain, and propose novel applications of this noninvasive neuromodulation method. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available