4.0 Review

Automatic auditory intelligence: An expression of the sensory-cognitive core of cognitive processes

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 123-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.03.001

Keywords

Animal; Auditory cognition; Human; Magnetic equivalent of MMN (MMNm); Mismatch negativity (MMN); Perception

Categories

Funding

  1. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  2. Academy of Finland [122745, 127595]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we present a new view on the nature of cognitive processes suggesting that there is a common core, viz., automatic sensory cognitive processes that form the basis for higher-order cognitive processes. It has been shown that automatic sensory cognitive processes are shared by humans and various other species and occur at different developmental stages and even in different states of consciousness. This evidence, based on the automatic electrophysiological change-detection response mismatch negativity (MMN), its magnetoencephalographic equivalent MMNm, and behavioral data, indicates that in audition surprisingly complex processes occur automatically and mainly in the sensory-specific cortical regions. These processes include, e.g. stimulus anticipation and extrapolation, sequential stimulus rule extraction, and pattern and pitch-interval encoding. Furthermore, these complex perceptual cognitive processes, first found in waking adults, occur similarly even in sleeping newborns, anesthetized animals, and deeply sedated adult humans, suggesting that they form the common perceptual cognitive core of cognitive processes in general. Although the present evidence originates mainly from the auditory modality, it is likely that analogous evidence could be obtained from other sensory modalities when measures corresponding to those used in the study of the auditory modality become available. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available