4.0 Review

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in experimental stroke and its effects on infarct size and functional outcome: A systematic review

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 71-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.09.002

Keywords

G-CSF; Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Ischaemic stroke

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0501997]
  2. Medical Research Council [G0501997] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [G0501997] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) shows promise as a treatment for stroke. This systematic review assesses G-CSF in experimental ischaemic stroke Methods. Relevant studies were identified with searches of Medline, Embase and PubMed Data were extracted on stroke lesion size, neurological outcome and quality, and analysed using Cochrane Review Manager using random effects models, results are expressed as standardised mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR). Results Data were included from 19 publications incorporating 666 animals G-CSF reduced lesion size significantly in transient (SMD -1.63, p < 0 00001) but not permanent (SMD -1 S6, p = 0 11) focal models of ischaemia. Lesion size was reduced at all doses and with treatment commenced within 4 h of transient ischaemia Neurological deficit (SMD -137, p = 0.0004) and limb placement (SMD -188, p = 0 003) improved with G-CSF, however, locomotor activity (>= 4 weeks post-ischaemia) was not (SMD 0 76, p = 0 35) Death (OR 0 27, p < 0.0001) was reduced with G-CSF Median study quality was 4 (range 0-7/8), Egger's test suggested significant publication bias (p < 0 001) Conclusions G-CSF significantly reduced lesion size in transient but not permanent models of ischaemic stroke Motor impairment and death were also reduced Further studies assessing dose response, administration time, length of ischaemia and long-term functional recovery are needed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available