4.5 Article

Passive tactile recognition of geometrical shape in humans An fMRI study

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages 223-231

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.08.001

Keywords

Somatosensory system; Fronto parietal network; Recognition; Tactile; fMRI

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tactile shape discrimination involves frontal other than somatosensory cortex (Palva et al 2005 [48]) but It is unclear if this frontal activity is related to exploratory concomitants In this study we investigated topographical details of prefrontal premotor and parietal areas during passive tactile recognition of 2D geometrical shapes in conditions avoiding exploratory movements Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed while the same wooden 2D geometrical shapes were blindly pressed on subjects passive right palm in three conditions In the RAW condition shapes were pressed while subjects were asked to attend to the stimuli but were not trained to recognize them After a brief training in the SHAPE condition subjects were asked to covertly recognize shapes In the RECOGNITION condition they were asked to overtly recognize shapes using response buttons with their opposite hand Results showed that somatosensory cortex including contralateral SII contralateral SI and left insula was active in all conditions confirming its importance in processing tactile shapes In the RAW vs SHAPE contrast bilateral posterior parietal insular premotor prefrontal and (left) Broca s areas were more active in the latter In the RECOGNITION activation of (left) Broca s area correlated with correct responses These results suggest that even without exploratory movements passive recognition of tactile geometrical shapes Involves prefrontal and premotor as well as somatosensory regions In this framework Broca s area might be involved in a successful selection and/or execution of the correct responses (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available