4.5 Article

Activation lateralization in human core, belt, and parabelt auditory fields with unilateral deafness compared to normal hearing

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1454, Issue -, Pages 33-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.066

Keywords

Auditory cortex; Adult unilateral deafness; Single-event BOLD response; Neuroplasticity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01 DC009010]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS37237]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied activation magnitudes in core, belt, and parabelt auditory cortex in adults with normal hearing (NH) and unilateral hearing loss (UHL) using an interrupted, single-event design and monaural stimulation with random spectrographic sounds. NH patients had one ear blocked and received stimulation on the side matching the intact ear in UHL. The objective was to determine whether the side of deafness affected lateralization and magnitude of evoked blood oxygen level-dependent responses across different auditory cortical fields (ACFs). Regardless of ear of stimulation, NH showed larger contralateral responses in several ACFs. With right ear stimulation in UHL, ipsilateral responses were larger compared to NH in core and belt ACFs, indicating neuroplasticity in the right hemisphere. With left ear stimulation in UHL, only posterior core ACFs showed larger ipsilateral responses, suggesting that most ACFs in the left hemisphere had greater resilience against reduced crossed inputs from a deafferented right ear. Parabelt regions located posterolateral to core and belt auditory cortex showed reduced activation in UHL compared to NH irrespective of RE/LE stimulation and lateralization of inputs. Thus, the effect in UHL compared to NH differed by ACF and ear of deafness. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available