4.5 Review

The current status of the simulation theory of cognition

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1428, Issue -, Pages 71-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.026

Keywords

Simulation; Memory; Cognition; Consciousness; Thought; Anticipation

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Linnaeus Centre for Cognition, Communication and Learning at Lund University
  3. Soderberg foundation
  4. Ahlen foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is proposed that thinking is simulated interaction with the environment. Three assumptions underlie this 'simulation' theory of cognitive function. Firstly, behaviour can be simulated in the sense that we can activate motor structures, as during a normal overt action, but suppress its execution. Secondly, perception can be simulated by internal activation of sensory cortex in a way that resembles its normal activation during perception of external stimuli. The third assumption ('anticipation') is that both overt and simulated actions can elicit perceptual simulation of their most probable consequences. A large body of evidence, mainly from neuroimaging studies, that supports these assumptions, is reviewed briefly. The theory is ontologically parsimonious and does not rely on standard cognitivist constructs such as internal models or representations. It is argued that the simulation approach can explain the relations between motor, sensory and cognitive functions and the appearance of an inner world. It also unifies and explains important features of a wide variety of cognitive phenomena such as memory and cognitive maps. Novel findings from recent developments in memory research on the similarity of imaging and memory and on the role of both prefrontal cortex and sensory cortex in declarative memory and working memory are predicted by the theory and provide striking support for it. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled The Cognitive Neuroscience. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available