4.7 Article

HOx observations over West Africa during AMMA: impact of isoprene and NOx

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages 9415-9429

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-9415-2010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EU
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council through the AMMA-UK Consortium
  3. National Centre for Atmospheric Science
  4. NERC [ncas10006, ncas10007, ncas10008] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B505538/1, ncas10007, ncas10008, ncas10006] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aircraft OH and HO2 measurements made over West Africa during the AMMA field campaign in summer 2006 have been investigated using a box model constrained to observations of long-lived species and physical parameters. Good agreement was found for HO2 (modelled to observed gradient of 1.23 +/- 0.11). However, the model significantly overpredicts OH concentrations. The reasons for this are not clear, but may reflect instrumental instabilities affecting the OH measurements. Within the model, HOx concentrations in West Africa are controlled by relatively simple photochemistry, with production dominated by ozone photolysis and reaction of O(D-1) with water vapour, and loss processes dominated by HO2 + HO2 and HO2 + RO2. Isoprene chemistry was found to influence forested regions. In contrast to several recent field studies in very low NOx and high isoprene environments, we do not observe any dependence of model success for HO2 on isoprene and attribute this to efficient recycling of HOx through RO2 + NO reactions under the moderate NOx concentrations (5-300 ppt NO in the boundary layer, median 76 ppt) encountered during AMMA. This suggests that some of the problems with understanding the impact of isoprene on atmospheric composition may be limited to the extreme low range of NOx concentrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available