4.5 Article

Hydrogen-rich saline improves memory function in a rat model of amyloid-beta-induced Alzheimer's disease by reduction of oxidative stress

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1328, Issue -, Pages 152-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.046

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid; Hydrogen; Oxidative stress

Categories

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [30471927, 30971199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is to examine if hydrogen-rich saline reduced amyloid beta (A beta) induced neural inflammation, and learning and memory deficits in a rat model. S-D male rats (n=84, 280-330 g) were divided into three groups, sham-operated, A beta 1-42 injected and A beta 1-42 plus hydrogen-rich saline-treated animals. Hydrogen-rich saline (5 ml/kg, i.p., daily) was injected for 14 days after intracerebroventricular injection of A beta 1-42. The levels of MDA, IL-6 and TNF-alpha were assessed by biochemical and ELISA analysis. Morris Water Maze and open field task were used to assess the memory dysfunction and motor dysfunction, respectively. LTP were used to detect the electrophysiology changes, HNE and GFAP immunohistochemistry were used to assess the oxidative stress and glial cell activation. After A beta 1-42 injection, the levels of MDA, IL-6, and TNF-alpha were increased in brain tissues and hydrogen-rich saline treatment suppressed MDA, IL-6, and TNF-alpha concentration. Hydrogen-rich saline treatment improved Morris Water Maze and enhanced LTP in hippocampus blocked by A beta 1-42. Furthermore, hydrogen-rich saline treatment also decreased the immunoreactivitiy of HNE and GFAP in hippocampus induced by A beta 1-42. In conclusion, hydrogen-rich saline prevented A beta-induced neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, which may contribute to the improvement of memory dysfunction in this rat model. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available