4.5 Article

Effect of immunomodulatory medication on regional gray matter loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis-A longitudinal MRI study

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1325, Issue -, Pages 174-182

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.035

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; MRI; Gray matter; Voxel-based morphometry; Immunomodulatory medication; Interferone

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G0900908] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0900908] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0900908] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prevention of global gray matter (GM) volume changes in multiple sclerosis (MS) are an objective in clinical trials, but the effect of immunomodulatory medication on regional GM atrophy progression is unclear. MRIs from 86 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) followed up for 24 months were analyzed using voxel-based morphometry. An analysis of covariance model (cluster threshold, corrected p<0.05) was used to compare GM volumes between baseline and follow-up while stratified by immunomodulatory medication (IM): Interferone INF-beta-1a (n=34), INF-beta-1b (n=16), glatiramer acetate (GA) (n=15), and no-immunomodulatory treatment (n=21). In the INF-beta-1a/1b group (n=50), significant GM volume reductions were observed during follow-up in fronto-temporal, cingulate and cerebellar cortical brain regions, without significant differences between the INF-beta-1a and INF-beta-1b patients. In the GA group and in unmedicated patients, no significant regional GM volume reductions were observed. In contrast to GA, INF-beta-1a/1b treatment was associated with GM volume reductions in hippocampal/parahippocampal and anterior ungulate cortex. This is the first longitudinal study investigating the effects of IMs on GM in RRMS. Results suggest differences in the dynamics of regional GM volume atrophy in differentially treated or untreated RRMS patients. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available