4.5 Article

Curcumin is protective against phenytoin-induced cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in rats

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1301, Issue -, Pages 52-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.027

Keywords

Phenytoin; Curcumin; Cognitive impairment; Oxidative stress

Categories

Funding

  1. Institute Research Grant
  2. All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigates the effect of chronic curcumin administration on phenytoin-induced cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in rats. Male Wistar rats were administered drugs/vehicle for 21 days. Learning and memory was evaluated using the passive avoidance paradigm and the elevated plus maze. On day 21, serum phenytoin concentrations and whole brain malondialdehyde (MDA) and glutathione (GSH) levels were estimated. Phenytoin (75 mg/kg, i.p.) produced significant deficits in learning/memory as indicated by the significant increase in retention transfer latency in elevated plus maze test and a significant decrease in retention latency in the passive avoidance paradigm. Chronic administration of phenytoin also produced significant elevations in brain MDA and reduction of brain GSH levels. Curcumin (100, 200 and 300 mg/kg, orally), when administered with phenytoin, significantly prevented phenytoin-induced cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in a dose-dependent manner. There were no significant differences in the serum levels of phenytoin in any of the treatment groups. This study demonstrates that curcumin is effective in preventing phenytoin-induced cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in rats without altering the serum phenytoin levels. This suggests the potential of adjuvant curcumin therapy in ameliorating cognitive impairment caused by chronic phenytoin therapy. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available