4.5 Article

The nociceptin system and hippocampal cognition in mice A pharmacological and genetic analysis

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1305, Issue -, Pages S7-S19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.075

Keywords

Nociceptin; NOP receptor; Ro 64-6198; Learning and memory; Mice

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Labour Market Insurance (AFA)
  2. Funds of Karolinska Institutet
  3. Marcus and Amalia Wallenberg Foundation
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Systembolaget AB and Wallenberg Consortium North

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the effects of NOP agonists nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and Ro 64-6198, NOP antagonists [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)-NH2 Nphe(1) and naloxone benzoylhydrazone (NalBzoH) on spatial memory in NMRI mice and pronociceptin (proNC) knockout (KO) mice using the water maze task. N/OFQ administered i.c.v. (1, 5 and 10 nmol/mouse) and into hippocampal CA3 (1 nmol/mouse, bilaterally), impaired acquisition and retention in the maze. Impairments were blocked by pre-treatment with Nphe(1) (10 nmol, i.c.v..). Ro 64-6198 (0.1-0.3-1 mg/kg i.p.) also dose-dependently impaired learning. However, pre-treatment with NalBzoH (1 mg/kg, S.C.) failed to modify the effects of Ro 64-6198. Nphe(1)(10 nmol/mouse i.c.v.) and NalBzoH (1 mg/kg, S.C.) by themselves failed to affect maze performance, despite a tendency for enhanced performance. Prepro N/OFQ knockout (ppN/OFQ-/-) showed evidence of improved learning, evident at retention trials and in reversal training. ppN/OFQ -/- mice were not impaired by N/OFQ (10 nmol i.c.v.) in the task, suggesting that changes in postsynaptic NOP receptors may occur in such KO mice. It is concluded that N/OFQ and NOP receptors have an important role in hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory, probably by modulation of glutamatergic functions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available