4.5 Article

Females exhibit more extensive amyloid, but not tau, pathology in an Alzheimer transgenic model

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1216, Issue -, Pages 92-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.079

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; transgenic mice; amyloid beta; beta-secretase; neprilysin; gender difference; oligomer; tau; hyperphosphorylation

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG022455, AG026478] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological studies indicate that women have a higher risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) even after adjustment for age. Though transgenic mouse models of AD develop AD-related amyloid beta (Abeta) and/or tau pathology, gender differences have not been well documented in these models. In this study, we found that female 3xTg-AD transgenic mice expressing mutant APP, presenilin-1 and tau have significantly more aggressive Abeta pathology. We also found an increase in beta-secretase activity and a reduction of neprilysin in female mice compared to males; this suggests that a combination of increased Abeta production and decreased Abeta degradation may contribute to higher risk of AD in females. In contrast to significantly more aggressive Abeta pathology in females, gender did not affect the levels of phosphorylated tau in 3xTg-AD mice. These results point to the involvement of Abeta pathways in the higher risk of AD in women. In addition to comparison of pathology between genders at 9, 16 and 23 months of age, we examined the progression of Abeta pathology at additional age points; i.e., brain Abeta load, intraneuronal oligomeric Abeta distribution and plaque load, in male 3xTg-AD mice at 3,6,9,12,16,20 and 23 months of age. These findings confirm progressive Abeta pathology in 3xTg-AD transgenic mice, and provide guidance for their use in therapeutic research. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available