4.4 Article

Frontoparietal and Cingulo-opercular Networks Play Dissociable Roles in Control of Working Memory

Journal

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 2019-2034

Publisher

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00838

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. MRC [MR/J009024/1]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre based at Oxford University Hospitals Trust Oxford University
  4. MRC UK MEG [MR/K005464/1]
  5. MRC [MR/K005464/1, MR/J009024/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/J009024/1, MR/K005464/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used magnetoencephalography to characterize the spatio-temporal dynamics of cortical activity during top-down control of working memory (WM). fMRI studies have previously implicated both the frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks in control over WM, but their respective contributions are unclear. In our task, spatial cues indicating the relevant item in a WM array occurred either before the memory array or during the maintenance period, providing a direct comparison between prospective and retrospective control of WM. We found that in both cases a frontoparietal network activated following the cue, but following retro-cues this activation was transient and was succeeded by a cingulo-opercular network activation. We also characterized the time course of top-down modulation of alpha activity in visual/parietal cortex. This modulation was transient following retrocues, occurring in parallel with the frontoparietal network activation. We suggest that the frontoparietal network is responsible for top-down modulation of activity in sensory cortex during both preparatory attention and orienting within memory. In contrast, the cingulo-opercular network plays a more downstream role in cognitive control, perhaps associated with output gating of memory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available