4.5 Article

The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: An rTMS study

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1224, Issue -, Pages 69-78

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.070

Keywords

artificial grammar learning; inferior frontal cortex; Broca's region; syntactic processing; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Categories

Funding

  1. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
  2. F. C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
  3. Radboud University Medical Centre
  4. Vetenskapsradet [8276]
  5. Hedlunds Stiftelse and Stockholm County Council (ALF, FoUU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The human capacity to implicitly acquire knowledge of structured sequences has recently been investigated in artificial grammar learning using functional magnetic resonance imaging, It was found that the left inferior frontal cortex (IFC; Brodmann's area (BA) 44/45) was related to classification performance. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the IFC (BA 44/4S) is causally related to classification of artificial syntactic structures by means of an off-line repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) paradigm. We manipulated the stimulus material in a 2 x 2 factorial design with grammaticality status and local substring familiarity as factors. The participants showed a reliable effect of grammaticality on classification of novel items after 5days of exposure to grammatical exemplars without performance feedback in an implicit acquisition task. The results show that rTMS of BA 44/45 improves syntactic classification performance by increasing the rejection rate of non-grammatical items and by shortening reaction times of correct rejections specifically after left-sided stimulation. A similar pattern of results is observed in FMRI experiments on artificial syntactic classification. These results suggest that activity in the inferior frontal region is causally related to artificial syntax processing. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available