4.7 Article

Brain metabolism is significantly impaired at blood glucose below 6 mM and brain glucose below 1 mM in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

Journal

CRITICAL CARE
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/cc8869

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  2. SUVA Fonds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The optimal blood glucose target following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) must be defined. Cerebral microdialysis was used to investigate the influence of arterial blood and brain glucose on cerebral glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate, and calculated indices of downstream metabolism. Methods: In twenty TBI patients, microdialysis catheters inserted in the edematous frontal lobe were dialyzed at 1 mu l/min, collecting samples at 60 minute intervals. Occult metabolic alterations were determined by calculating the lactate-pyruvate (L/P), lactate-glucose (L/Glc), and lactate-glutamate (L/Glu) ratios. Results: Brain glucose was influenced by arterial blood glucose. Elevated L/P and L/Glc were significantly reduced at brain glucose above 1 mM, reaching lowest values at blood and brain glucose levels between 6-9 mM (P < 0.001). Lowest cerebral glutamate was measured at brain glucose 3-5 mM with a significant increase at brain glucose below 3 mM and above 6 mM. While L/Glu was significantly increased at low brain glucose levels, it was significantly decreased at brain glucose above 5 mM (P < 0.001). Insulin administration increased brain glutamate at low brain glucose, but prevented increase in L/Glu. Conclusions: Arterial blood glucose levels appear to be optimal at 6-9 mM. While low brain glucose levels below 1 mM are detrimental, elevated brain glucose are to be targeted despite increased brain glutamate at brain glucose > 5 mM. Pathogenity of elevated glutamate appears to be relativized by L/Glu and suggests to exclude insulin-induced brain injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available