4.6 Review

Convection-Enhanced Drug Delivery to the Brain: Therapeutic Potential and Neuropathological Considerations

Journal

BRAIN PATHOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 117-127

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12082

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; blood-brain barrier; convection-enhanced delivery; drug delivery; glioma; Parkinson's disease; perivascular spaces

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. Royal College of Surgeons of England
  3. Dunhill Medical Trust
  4. Alzheimer's Research UK
  5. EPSRC [EP/G061831/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G061831/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) describes a direct method of drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters. By establishing a pressure gradient at the tip of the infusion catheter in order to exploit bulk flow through the interstitial spaces of the brain, CED offers a number of advantages over conventional drug delivery methodsbypass of the blood-brain barrier, targeted distribution through large brain volumes and minimization of systemic side effects. Despite showing early promise, CED is yet to fulfill its potential as a mainstream strategy for the treatment of neurological disease. Substantial research effort has been dedicated to optimize the technology for CED and identify the parameters, which govern successful drug distribution. It seems likely that successful clinical translation of CED will depend on suitable catheter technology being used in combination with drugs with optimal physicochemical characteristics, and on neuropathological analysis in appropriate preclinical models. In this review, we consider the factors most likely to influence the success or failure of CED, and review its application to the treatment of high-grade glioma, Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available