4.6 Article

Axonal Loss and Neurofilament Phosphorylation Changes Accompany Lesion Development and Clinical Progression in Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

BRAIN PATHOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 428-440

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2010.00466.x

Keywords

axonal loss; disease progression; multiple sclerosis; neurofilament phosphorylation; spinal cord

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) transregional collaborative research center [43]
  2. Foundation of the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  3. DFG [GRK 632 Neuroplasticity]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroaxonal damage and loss are increasingly recognized as disability determining features in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology. However, little is known about the long-term sequelae of inflammatory demyelination on neurons and axons. Spinal cord tissue of 31 MS patients was compared to three amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and 10 control subjects. MS lesions were staged according to the density of KiM-1P positive macrophages and microglia and the presence of myelin basic protein (MBP) positive phagocytes. T cells were quantified in the parenchyma and meninges. Neuroaxonal changes were studied by immunoreactivity (IR) for amyloid precursor protein (APP) and variably phosphorylated neurofilaments (SMI312, SMI31, SMI32). Little T cell infiltration was still evident in chronic inactive lesions. The loss of SMI32 IR in ventral horn neurons correlated with MS lesion development and disease progression. Similarly, axonal loss in white matter (WM) lesions correlated with disease duration. A selective reduction of axonal phosphorylated neurofilaments (SMI31) was observed in WM lesions. In ALS, the loss of neuronal SMI32 IR was even more pronounced, whereas the relative axonal reduction resembled that found in MS. Progressive neuroaxonal neurofilament alterations in the context of chronic inflammatory demyelination may reflect changes in neuroaxonal metabolism and result in chronic neuroaxonal dysfunction as a putative substrate of clinical progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available