4.4 Review

Brain-computer interfacing in disorders of consciousness

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 1510-1522

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2012.698362

Keywords

Vegetative state; unresponsive wakefulness syndrome; minimally conscious state; electroencephalography; command following; communication

Funding

  1. Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  2. European Commission [FP7-247919 DECODER]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  4. Mind Science Foundation
  5. French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action [ARC-06/11-340]
  6. Fondation Medicale Reine Elisabeth
  7. University of Liege
  8. CNRS/FNRS-CGRI collaboration funds
  9. UK Medical Research Council [U.1055.01.002.00001.01]
  10. Canada Excellence Research Chairs Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent neuroimaging research has strikingly demonstrated the existence of covert awareness in some patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). These findings have highlighted the potential for the development of simple brain-computer interfaces (BCI) as a diagnosis in behaviourally unresponsive patients. Objectives: This study here reviews current EEG-based BCIs that hold potential for assessing and eventually assisting patients with DoC. It highlights key areas for further development that might eventually make their application feasible in this challenging patient group. Methods: The major types of BCIs proposed in the literature are considered, namely those based on the P3 potential, sensorimotor rhythms, steady state oscillations and slow cortical potentials. In each case, a brief overview of the relevant literature is provided and then their relative merits for BCI applications in DoC are considered. Results: A range of BCI designs have been proposed and tested for enabling communication in fully conscious, paralysed patients. Although many of these have potential applicability for patients with DoC, they share some key challenges that need to be overcome, including limitations of stimulation modality, feedback, user training and consistency. Conclusion: Future work will need to address the technical and practical challenges facing reliable implementation at the patient's bedside.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available