4.4 Article

Bilateral basal ganglia activity in verbal working memory

Journal

BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages 316-323

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.05.003

Keywords

Caudate; Working memory; Attention; Subcortical

Funding

  1. American Federation of Aging Research award
  2. VA RR&D Advanced Research Career Development Award
  3. VA RR&D Career Development Transition Award
  4. Senior Research Career Scientist Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service [B6364S]
  5. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01 DC007387]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the cortical substrates of verbal working memory are reasonably well understood, less is known about the relative contribution of subcortical structures to verbal working memory. Therefore, in addition to elaboration of a model of verbal working memory by including a specific focus on basal ganglia, the purpose of this study also was to examine potential differences in neural function across the complete process of verbal working memory, from encoding through retrieval. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to observe regions of brain activation in neurologically normal participants during a task of verbal working memory. The expected frontal-parietal network was found to be active over the course of the verbal working memory task. The encoding portion of the task engaged left inferior frontal regions and bilateral caudate and thalamus. Bilateral medial thalamus and posterior cingulate regions were engaged during the maintenance phase of the task. Retrieval activated the left inferior frontal sulcus and posterior parietal/occipital regions. Findings are considered in light of current models of verbal working memory and subcortical structures. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available