4.2 Article

Epidemiology of acute encephalopathy in Japan, with emphasis on the association of viruses and syndromes

Journal

BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 337-343

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2011.07.012

Keywords

Acute encephalopathy; Epidemiology; Acute necrotizing encephalopathy; Acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion; Clinically mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan [H22-Nanji-Ippan-49, 21B-5, 21210301, KB220001]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21249062, 20209753, 22591176]
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. Japan Epilepsy Research Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591518, 21200017, 22591176] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A research committee supported by the Japanese government conducted a nationwide survey on the epidemiology of acute encephalopathy in Japan using a questionnaire. A total of 983 cases reportedly had acute encephalopathy during the past 3 years, 2007-2010. Among the pathogens of the preceding infection, influenza virus was the most common, followed by human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) and rotavirus. Among syndromes of acute encephalopathy, acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion (AESD) was the most frequent, followed by clinically mild encephalitis/encephalopathy with a reversible splenial lesion (MERS), acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE) and hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome (HSES). Influenza virus was strongly associated with ANE and MERS, HHV-6 with AESD, and rotavirus with MERS. Mortality was high in ANE and HSES, but was low in AESD, MERS and HHV-6-associated encephalopathy. Neurologic sequelae were common in AESD and ANE, but were absent in MERS. (C) 2011 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available