4.7 Article

Nocturnal sleep enhances working memory training in Parkinson's disease but not Lewy body dementia

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 2789-2797

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/aws192

Keywords

consolidation; sleep; working memory; training; Parkinson's disease; dementia with Lewy bodies

Funding

  1. National Institutes on Health [R01 NS-050595, F32 AG-041543, KL2 RR-025009, UL1 RR-025008]
  2. Emory University School of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Working memory is essential to higher order cognition (e. g. fluid intelligence) and to performance of daily activities. Though working memory capacity was traditionally thought to be inflexible, recent studies report that working memory capacity can be trained and that offline processes occurring during sleep may facilitate improvements in working memory performance. We utilized a 48-h in-laboratory protocol consisting of repeated digit span forward (short-term attention measure) and digit span backward (working memory measure) tests and overnight polysomnography to investigate the specific sleep-dependent processes that may facilitate working memory performance improvements in the synucleinopathies. We found that digit span backward performance improved following a nocturnal sleep interval in patients with Parkinson's disease on dopaminergic medication, but not in those not taking dopaminergic medication and not in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies. Furthermore, the improvements in patients with Parkinson's disease on dopaminergic medication were positively correlated with the amount of slow-wave sleep that patients obtained between training sessions and negatively correlated with severity of nocturnal oxygen desaturation. The translational implication is that working memory capacity is potentially modifiable in patients with Parkinson's disease but that sleep disturbances may first need to be corrected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available