Journal
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 486-503Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546491
Keywords
-
Funding
- NCI NIH HHS [R25CA128770, R25 CA128770] Funding Source: Medline
- NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R25CA128770] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Past research has demonstrated that news coverage of cancer research, and scientific research generally, rarely contains discourse-based hedging, including caveats, limitations, and uncertainties. In a multiple message experiment (k=4 news stories, N=1082), the authors examined whether hedging shaped the perceptions of news consumers. The results revealed that participants were significantly less fatalistic about cancer (p=.039) and marginally less prone to nutritional backlash (p=.056) after exposure to hedged articles. Participants exposed to articles mentioning a second researcher (unaffiliated with the present study) exhibited greater trust in medical professions (p=.001). The findings provide additional support for the inclusion of discourse-based hedging in cancer news coverage and suggest that news consumers will use scientific uncertainty in illness representations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available