4.7 Article

Embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells improve spinal muscular atrophy phenotype in mice

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages 465-481

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp318

Keywords

stem cells; transplantation; spinal muscular atrophy; motor neuron

Funding

  1. FSMA [GGP06043]
  2. Cariplo Foundation
  3. Fondazione Telethon Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal muscular atrophy, characterized by selective loss of lower motor neurons, is an incurable genetic neurological disease leading to infant mortality. We previously showed that primary neural stem cells derived from spinal cord can ameliorate the spinal muscular atrophy phenotype in mice, but this primary source has limited translational value. Here, we illustrate that pluripotent stem cells from embryonic stem cells show the same potential therapeutic effects as those derived from spinal cord and offer great promise as an unlimited source of neural stem cells for transplantation. We found that embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells can differentiate into motor neurons in vitro and in vivo. In addition, following their intrathecal transplantation into spinal muscular atrophy mice, the neural stem cells, like those derived from spinal cord, survived and migrated to appropriate areas, ameliorated behavioural endpoints and lifespan, and exhibited neuroprotective capability. Neural stem cells obtained using a drug-selectable embryonic stem cell line yielded the greatest improvements. As with cells originating from primary tissue, the embryonic stem cell-derived neural stem cells integrated appropriately into the parenchyma, expressing neuron- and motor neuron-specific markers. Our results suggest translational potential for the use of pluripotent cells in neural stem cell-mediated therapies and highlight potential safety improvements and benefits of drug selection for neuroepithelial cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available