4.7 Article

Anterior thalamic lesions stop synaptic plasticity in retrosplenial cortex slices: expanding the pathology of diencephalic amnesia

Journal

BRAIN
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 1847-1857

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp090

Keywords

diencephalic amnesia; long-term depression; diaschisis; retrosplenial cortex; anterior thalamus; Alzheimers disease

Funding

  1. BBSRC [BB/F00236X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. MRC [G9713086, G0401403] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F00236X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0401403, G9713086] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F00236X/1] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Medical Research Council [G9713086, G0401403] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent, convergent evidence places the anterior thalamic nuclei at the heart of diencephalic amnesia. However, the reasons for the severe memory loss in diencephalic amnesia remain unknown. A potential clue comes from the dense, reciprocal connections between the anterior thalamic nuclei and retrosplenial cortex, another region vital for memory. We now report a loss of synaptic plasticity [long-term depression (LTD)] in rat retrosplenial cortex slices months following an anterior thalamic lesion. The loss of LTD was lamina-specific, occurring only in superficial layers of the cortex and was associated with a decrease in GABA(A)-mediated inhibitory transmission. As retrosplenial cortex is itself vital for memory, this distal lesion effect will amplify the impact of anterior thalamic lesions. These findings not only provide novel insights into the functional pathology of diencephalic amnesia and have implications for the aetiology of the posterior cingulate hypoactivity in Alzheimers disease, but also show how distal changes in plasticity could contribute to diaschisis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available