4.4 Article

Dependence of Turbulent Velocities on Wind Speed and Stratification

Journal

BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY
Volume 155, Issue 1, Pages 55-71

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-014-9992-5

Keywords

Nocturnal boundary layer; Stable boundary layer; Stratified turbulence; Surface layer; Turbulence

Funding

  1. DTRA [HDTRA1-10-1-0033]
  2. NSF [AGS-1115011]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1115011] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the dependence of several turbulence quantities on the wind speed and stability using nocturnal data from the Shallow Cold Pool Experiment. The turbulent quantities (velocities) are defined in terms of the standard deviation of the horizontal and vertical velocity fluctuations, two different calculations of the friction velocity, and two turbulent velocities based on the heat flux. The dependence of the turbulent velocities on the wind speed shows a transition between the weak-wind regime of small slope and the stronger wind regime of larger slope, as found in previous studies. This transition occurs for all of the turbulent velocities examined and occurs for a wide range of averaging times. Although this study concentrates primarily on data over a flat surface above the valley, the transition also occurs at the other 18 stations that have non-zero local slopes up to about 10 %. At the same time, the relationship between the turbulence and the wind speed cannot be universal because of the influence of stratification and site-dependent non-stationarity in the weak-wind regime. The wind speed of the transition increases with increasing stratification at a rate that is an order of magnitude slower than that predicted by a constant transition bulk Richardson number. For the weakest winds, the impact of stratification is unexpectedly small.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available