4.6 Article

Refined broad-scale sub-glacial morphology of Aurora Subglacial Basin, East Antarctica derived by an ice-dynamics-based interpolation scheme

Journal

CRYOSPHERE
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 551-560

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-5-551-2011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D003733/1]
  2. NSF [ANT-0733025]
  3. Jackson School of Geosciences
  4. G. Unger Vetlesen Foundation
  5. Australian Antarctic Division [ASAC 3103]
  6. Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centre through the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre (ACE CRC)
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F016646/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. NERC [NE/F016646/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0733025] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ice thickness data over much of East Antarctica are sparse and irregularly distributed. This poses difficulties for reconstructing the homogeneous coverage needed to properly assess underlying sub-glacial morphology and fundamental geometric constraints on sea level rise. Here we introduce a new physically-based ice thickness interpolation scheme and apply this to existing ice thickness data in the Aurora Subglacial Basin region. The skill and robustness of the new reconstruction is demonstrated by comparison with new data from the ICECAP project. The interpolated morphology shows an extensive marine-based ice sheet, with considerably more area below sea-level than shown by prior studies. It also shows deep features connecting the coastal grounding zone with the deepest regions in the interior. This has implications for ice sheet response to a warming ocean and underscores the importance of obtaining additional high resolution data in these marginal zones for modelling ice sheet evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available