4.1 Article

Origin, elevation, and evolutionary success of hybrids and polyploids in British Columbia, Canada

Journal

BOTANY
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages 182-188

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-2012-0177

Keywords

polyploidization; elevation gradients; allopolyploidy; autopolyploidy; hybridization

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant
  2. ACA Grant in Biodiversity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although it is well established that many clades have polyploidization in their evolutionary history, the question of whether polyploidization is actually adaptive is far from resolved. It has been hypothesized that the evolutionary advantages of polyploidy are context-dependent, although we have yet to clearly identify the geographical or ecological contexts in which polyploids are more common. One reason why polyploidy may be displaying idiosyncratic ecological patterns is that previous comparative studies have often not separated polyploids into allopolyploids and autopolyploids, and we posit that there may be important differences in the origin and evolutionary success between the two types. Here, we examine the distribution of allopolyploid, autopolyploid, and diploid hybrid species along an elevation gradient from sea level to similar to 4500 m within British Columbia, Canada, and find that polyploids (especially those of hybrid origin) are disproportionately present at high elevations. These processes of hybridization and polyploidization may contribute to species richness patterns observed in British Columbia. We discuss whether the associations are more likely to be the result of differential ecological tolerance or differential origination rates of allopolyploids at higher elevations. These findings highlight the importance of studying both hybridization and polyploidy when considering the diversification process in plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available