4.1 Article

Reproductive phenology of the Caribbean cactus Harrisia portoricensis: rainfall and temperature associations

Journal

BOTANY-BOTANIQUE
Volume 89, Issue 12, Pages 861-871

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/B11-072

Keywords

Caribbean dry forest; columnar cactus; Harrisia portoricensis; Mona Island; plant size; reproductive phenology

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Centers of Research Excellence in Science and Technology through the Center for Applied Tropical Ecology and Conservation of the University of Puerto Rico [HRD-0206200, HRD 0734826]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenological patterns often influence the extent of reproductive success of plants as well the interaction among species. In this study, we evaluated the association of local climatic factors and plant size with the reproductive phenology of the threatened cactus Harrisia portoricensis in the Caribbean dry forest of Mona Island. Analyses of phenological data gathered monthly in 572 plants over 2 years concluded that for this species, reproductive activity is continuous throughout the year and reproductive output is positively correlated with plant size. Bud production in H. portoricensis was positively associated with temporal changes in monthly mean and minimum temperatures, while flower production was positively associated with total monthly rainfall. When compared with other columnar cacti species, the combined phenological responses to temperature and rainfall in H. portoricensis represent a different strategy. We hypothesize that contrasting phenological responses among columnar cacti may stem from site-specific differences in the degree of intra-annual rainfall or temperature variability. If that is the case, then monitoring reproductive responses of cacti to expected changes in climate at a global scale would require gathering phenological data for this taxon across different geographic regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available