4.4 Article

The biogeography and genetic relationships of Juniperus oxycedrus and related taxa from the Mediterranean and Macaronesian regions

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 174, Issue 4, Pages 637-653

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/boj.12147

Keywords

microsatellites; genetic diversity; strait of Gibraltar; systematics; morphological variation; Bayesian clustering

Categories

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Sciences and Higher Education [NN303 1534 33]
  2. Institute of Dendrology PAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite Juniperus spp. being an important component of Mediterranean arid and semi-arid ecosystems, there is a lack of complex studies on their biogeographical patterns. Using 16 morphological cone and seed traits and three nuclear microsatellite markers, we investigated the morphological and genetic variability of seven Mediterranean and Macaronesian Juniperus taxa (J. oxycedrus ssp. oxycedrus, J. oxycedrus ssp. badia, J. brevifolia, J. cedrus, J. deltoides, J. macrocarpa and J. navicularis) to identify biogeographical trends and interspecific genetic relationships. The highest gene diversity was measured in J. oxycedrus ssp. oxycedrus (H-E = 0.716) and the lowest in J. brevifolia (H-E = 0.441). The west Mediterranean was characterized by a higher level of genetic diversity than the east Mediterranean. A lack of significant genetic differences between European and African populations of J. oxycedrus suggests that the Strait of Gibraltar was not a significant barrier to gene flow, but has promoted some morphological differentiation. The genetic and morphological results strongly support the recognition of J. macrocarpa, J. navicularis and J. deltoides at the species rank, whereas J. oxycedrus ssp. badia should be included in J. oxycedrus. (c) 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 174, 637-653.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available