4.4 Article

Is Epipactis pseudopurpurata distinct from E.?purpurata (Orchidaceae)? Evidence from morphology, anatomy, DNA and pollination biology

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 170, Issue 2, Pages 243-256

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01288.x

Keywords

internal transcribed spacer (ITS); orchids; phenotypic plasticity; plant identification; plastid markers; taxonomy

Categories

Funding

  1. VFEPWM in Gdansk [WFOS/D/210/129/2011]
  2. Gdansk University [538-L150-0774-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative analysis of the main distinctive features of Epipactis pseudopurpurata, according to the protologue, and E. purpurata revealed that the absence or disappearance, as well as the atrophy, of a viscidium is typical and characteristic of young ramets of E. purpurata and can also result from its removal by pollinators and other insect visitors. The gynostemium morphology is similar in both species examined. The minor differences in its shape are an indication of developmental variability. The morphology of numerous ramets of E. purpurata and of their gynostemia corresponds to Mereda's description of E. pseudopurpurata, suggesting phenotypic plasticity in the former species. Based on comparative analyses of both taxa, including molecular data, the authors propose to synonymize E. pseudopurpurata with E. purpurata in view of the low value of the taxonomic features distinguishing the two species. (c) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 170, 243256.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available