4.4 Review

A new subfamilial and tribal classification of the pantropical flowering plant family Annonaceae informed by molecular phylogenetics

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 169, Issue 1, Pages 5-40

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01235.x

Keywords

plastid markers; subfamilies; supermatrix; tribes

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [S85-324]
  2. VENI [863.09.017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pantropical flowering plant family Annonaceae is the most species-rich family of Magnoliales. Despite long-standing interest in the systematics of Annonaceae, no authoritative classification has yet been published in the light of recent molecular phylogenetic analyses. Here, using the largest, most representative, molecular dataset compiled on Annonaceae to date, we present, for the first time, a robust family-wide phylogenetic tree and subsequent classification. We used a supermatrix of up to eight plastid markers sequenced from 193 ingroup and seven outgroup species. Some of the relationships at lower taxonomic levels are poorly resolved, but deeper nodes generally receive high support. Annonaceae comprises four major clades, which are here given the taxonomic rank of subfamily. The description of Annonoideae is amended, and three new subfamilies are described: Anaxagoreoideae, Ambavioideae and Malmeoideae. In Annonoideae, seven tribes are recognized, one of which, Duguetieae, is described as new. In Malmeoideae, seven tribes are recognized, six of which are newly described: Dendrokingstonieae, Fenerivieae, Maasieae, Malmeeae, Monocarpieae and Piptostigmateae. This new subfamilial and tribal classification is discussed against the background of previous classifications and characters to recognize subfamilies are reviewed. (c) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 169, 540.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available