4.4 Article

Pollen tube growth and the pollen-tube pathway of Nymphaea odorata (Nymphaeaceae)

Journal

BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 162, Issue 4, Pages 581-593

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01039.x

Keywords

angiospermy; callose; carpel; character evolution; growth rate; hand-pollination; homoplasy; origin of angiosperms; Nymphaeales

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB 0640792]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important aspect of the evolution of carpel closure, or angiospermy, is the relationship between pollen tube growth patterns and internalization of the pollen-tube pathway. True carpel closure, involving postgenital fusion of inner carpel margins, is inferred to have arisen once within the ancient order Nymphaeales, in the common ancestor of Nymphaeaceae. We studied pollen tube development, from pollination to fertilization, in a natural population of Nymphaea odorata, using hand pollinations and timed flower collections. Pollen germinates in stigmatic secretions within 15 min and pollen tubes enter subdermal transmitting tissue within an hour, following wide intercellular spaces towards the zone of postgenital fusion. At the zone of fusion they turn downwards to grow in narrow spaces between interlocked cells and then wander freely to ovules within ovarian secretions. The pollen-tube pathway is 2-6 mm long and upper ovules are first penetrated 2.5 h after pollination. Pollen tubes grow at rates of approximately 1 mm/h whether in stigmatic fluid, transmitting tissues or ovarian secretions. Pollen-tube pathways are structurally diverse across Nymphaeales, yet their pollen tubes have similar morphologies and rapid growth rates. This pattern suggests pollen tube growth innovations preceded and were essential for the evolution of complete carpel closure. (C) 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 162, 581-593.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available