4.2 Article

Extracts of macroalgae from the Brazilian coast inhibit bacterial quorum sensing

Journal

BOTANICA MARINA
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 441-447

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/bot-2014-0031

Keywords

bacteria; biofouling; inhibition; macroalgae; quorum sensing

Funding

  1. Ciencias sem Fronteiras program of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-CNPq
  2. HM Sultan Qaboos Research Trust Fund [SR/AGR/FISH/10/01]
  3. SQU [IG/AGR/FISH/12/01]
  4. CNPq-PDJ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of polar (1:1 water/methanol) and non-polar (dichloromethane) extracts of macroalgae from Arraial do Cabo, RJ, Brazil, to inhibit quorum sensing (QS) was investigated. Before extraction, half of the algae were treated with 30% ethanol to kill and remove surface-associated bacteria. Twenty of 22 polar extracts inhibited the QS of the acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) producer and reporter Chromobacterium violaceum CV017 with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from 0.28 mu g ml(-1) (Ulva fasciata) to 189 mu g ml(-1) (Codium sp.). The MIC of non-polar extracts varied from 69 mu g ml(-1) (Sargassum furcatum) to 2730 mu g ml(-1) (Peyssonnelia capensis). Usually, extracts from algae with associated bacteria had a higher bioactivity than ones without them. Among 11 algal species tested, 50% of extracts with associated bacteria were toxic to C. violaceum CV026. None of the extracts contained AHLs, which was shown using reporters C. violaceum CV026 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens NTL4 (pZLR4). Polar (11%) and non-polar extracts (2%) inhibited QS-dependent attachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 at tissue-level concentrations. Our data suggest that secondary metabolites from algae and their associated microbiota are an important source of QS inhibitors, which potentially can be used in future biotechnological applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available