4.5 Article

Glutathione S-transferase gene variations influence BU pharmacokinetics and outcome of hematopoietic SCT in pediatric patients

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 939-946

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.265

Keywords

Busulfan; hematopoietic SCT; pharmacokinetics; children; GST; pharmacogenetics

Funding

  1. Geneva Cancer League
  2. CANSEARCH
  3. Hans Wilsdorf
  4. Telemaque
  5. Charles Bruneau foundations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BU is a key compound of conditioning regimens in children undergoing hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Inter-individual differences in BU pharmacokinetics (PKs) might affect BU efficacy and toxicity. As BU is mainly metabolized by glutathione S-transferase (GST), we investigated the relationship between GSTA1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genotypes with first-dose BU PKs, and the relationship with HSCT outcomes in 69 children receiving myeloablative conditioning regimen. GSTM1 null genotype correlated with higher BU exposure and lower clearance in patients older than 4 years (P <= 0.04). In accordance with the suggested functional role, GSTA1*A2 haplotype was associated with lower drug levels and higher drug clearance (P <= 0.03). Gene-dosage effect was also observed (P <= 0.007). GSTA1 haplotypes were associated with HSCT outcomes. Patients with two copies of haplotype *A2 had better event free survival (P = 0.03). In contrast, homozygous individuals for haplotypes *B and *B1 had higher occurrence of veno-occlusive disease (P = 0.009). GSTM1 null individuals older than 4 years had more frequently graft versus host disease (P = 0.03). In conclusion, we showed that GST gene variants influence BU PK and outcomes of HSCT in children. A model for the dosage adjustment with the inclusion of genetic and non-genetic factors should be evaluated in a future prospective validation cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available