4.2 Article

Implementing the NICE Guideline for Schizophrenia Recommendations for Psychological Therapies: A Qualitative Analysis of the Attitudes of CMHT Staff

Journal

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 48-59

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.691

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Guideline; Implementation; Attitudes; CBT; FI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Despite national guidelines recommending cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family intervention (FI) in the treatment of schizophrenia, levels of implementation in routine care remain low. The present study investigates attitudinal factors amongst community mental health team (CMHT) staff affecting guideline implementation. Design. CMHTs were audited to measure the capacity and delivery of CBT and FI, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff from the teams. Methods. Four CMHTs were audited, and five care coordinators from each team were interviewed. A purposive approach to sampling was used to represent the range of professional training of care coordinating staff. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results. Positive views towards guidelines were evident, although tempered by specific implementation issues. Employing simple psychological interventions and approaches as part of the care coordinating role also emerged as highly valued by staff. Severe workload, time pressure and the need for specialist staff were crucial barriers to implementation. Pessimistic views of recovery for clients with psychosis were also apparent and may affect implementation. Conclusions. Staff attitudes and knowledge are an important area of research when examining guideline implementation and require further study. Key themes that have emerged could inform future training agendas and should be considered when developing guideline implementation strategies for the updated 2009 guidelines. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available