4.5 Article

Mesenchymal stem cell as salvage treatment for refractory chronic GVHD

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1732-1740

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.195

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cell; refractory; chronic GVHD; transplantation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972790]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2006B36005003, 2007A032100003, 2009A030200009]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [2006Z2-E4071, 2008A1-E4011-4, 2008A1-E4011-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Refractory chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is an important complication after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT and is prognostic of poor outcome. MSCs are involved in tissue repair and modulating immune responses in vitro and in vivo. From April 2005 to October 2008, 19 patients with refractory cGVHD were treated with MSCs derived from the BM of volunteers. The median dose of MSCs was 0.6 x 10(6) cells per kg body weight. Fourteen of 19 patients (73.7%) responded well to MSCs, achieving a CR (n = 4) or a PR (n = 10). The immunosuppressive agent could be tapered to less than 50% of the starting dose in 5 of 14 surviving patients, and five patients could discontinue immunosuppressive agents. The median duration between MSC administration and immunosuppressive therapy discontinuation was 324 days (range, 200-550 days). No patients experienced adverse events during or immediately after MSC infusion. The 2-year survival rate was 77.7% in this study. Clinical improvement was accompanied by the increasing ratio of CD5+CD19+/CD5-CD19+ B cells and CD8+CD28+/CD8+CD28+ T cells. In conclusion, transfusion of MSCs expanded in vitro, irrespective of the donor, might be a safe and effective salvage therapy for patients with steroid-resistant, cGVHD. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2010) 45, 1732-1740; doi:10.1038/bmt.2010.195; published online 6 September 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available