4.5 Article

Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms influence the serum concentration of calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT recipients

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 1113-1117

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2010.273

Keywords

calcineurin inhibitor; polymorphism; CYP3A5; MDR1

Funding

  1. Tokai University School of Medicine Research Aid
  2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19101008, 23390191] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcineurin inhibitors are necessary as immunosuppressants during hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) to prevent alloreactivity, but have unfortunate toxicities. So, we investigated the association of gene polymorphisms with the initial calcineurin inhibitor concentration and the subsequent drug dose from day 1 to day 28 among patients who underwent HSCT at a single institution. We analyzed 58 serial cases of Japanese patients receiving GVHD prophylaxis with CsA (21 cases) or tacrolimus (37 cases). We investigated eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms: rs4244285 (CYP2C19), rs15524, rs4646450, rs3800959, rs776746 (CYP3A5), rs1128503, rs2032582 and rs1045642 (MDR1). The CsA concentration was significantly higher when the genotype of CYP3A5 rs15524 was T/T (P = 0.044) or rs776746 was G/G (P = 0.027). The CYP3A5 rs776746 and rs4646450 genotypes were also associated with tacrolimus concentration (P = 0.013 and P = 0.0058, respectively). The dosage of tacrolimus was remarkably reduced from day -1 to day 28 when the patient had the CYP3A5 rs4646450 C/C and/or rs776746 G/G genotype (P = 0.0010 and P = 0.0021, respectively). In this study, we show that genetic variation has a predictable effect on the pharmacological responses to calcineurin inhibitors in HSCT patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2011) 46, 1113-1117; doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.273; published online 22 November 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available