4.5 Article

High prevalence of metabolic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 49-54

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2008.263

Keywords

allogeneic stem cell transplantation; metabolic syndrome; late complications; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA [CA15704]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA015704, P30CA021765] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a cross-sectional study to estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, a clustering of risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease, among 86 adults who had allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplant (HCT) as compared with 258 age- and gender-matched US population controls selected from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. The median age at study enrollment was 50 years (range, 21-71), and patients were at a median of 3 years (range, 1-21) from HCT. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 49% (95% confidence intervals (CI), 38-60%) among HCT recipients, a 2.2-fold (95% CI, 1.3-3.6, P = 0.002) increase compared with controls. The prevalence rates of elevated blood pressure and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly higher among HCT recipients than among controls, but the prevalence rates of abdominal obesity, elevated blood glucose and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were not. HCT survivors with metabolic syndrome were more likely to have microalbuminuria (43 vs 10%) and elevated creatinine (31 vs 11%). No patient, donor or transplant characteristics were associated with the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome. We conclude that metabolic syndrome occurs frequently among allogeneic HCT survivors who are seen by transplant physicians. Approaches to screening, prevention and management of metabolic syndrome should be developed for HCT recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available