4.6 Article

Induced periosteum a complex cellular scaffold for the treatment of large bone defects

Journal

BONE
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 484-492

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.08.009

Keywords

Induced-periosteum; Induced membrane; Bone regeneration; Osteoprogenitor cells; MSC

Funding

  1. United Kingdom National Health Service: National Institute for Health Research, Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit
  2. WELMEC, a Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. EPSRC [WT 088908/Z/09/Z]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J017620/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/J017620/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Surgically induced periosteal membrane holds great potential for the treatment of large bone defects representing a simple alternative to combinations of exogenous stem cells, scaffolds and growth factors. The purpose of this study was to explore the biological basis for this novel regenerative medicine strategy in man. Methods: Eight patients with critical size defects were treated with the induced membrane (IM) technique. After membrane formation 1 cm(2) biopsy was taken together with matched, healthy diaphyseal periosteum (P) for comparative analysis. Morphological characteristics, cell composition and growth factor expression were compared. Functional and molecular evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) activity was performed. Results: Both tissues shared similar morphology although IM was significantly thicker than P (p = 0.032). The frequency of lymphocytes, pericytes (CD45(-)CD34(-)CD146(+)) and cells expressing markers consistent with bone marrow MSCs (CD45(-/low)CD271(bright)) were 31. 3 and 155-fold higher respectively in IM (all p = 0.043). IM contained 3-fold more cells per gramme of tissue with a similar proportion of endothelial cells (CD45(-)CD31(+)). Expressed bone morphogenic protein 2, vascular endothelial growth factor and stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1) are key tissue regeneration mediators. Adherent expanded cells from both tissues had molecular profiles similar to bone marrow MSCs but cells from IM expressed greater than 2 fold relative abundance of SDF-1transcript compared to P (p = 0.043). Conclusion: The IM is a thick, vascularised structure that resembles periosteum with a cellular composition and molecular profile facilitating large defect repair and therefore may be described as an induced-periosteum. This tissue offers a powerful example of in situ tissue engineering. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available