4.6 Article

Prevalence and progression of cardiovascular calcifications in peritoneal dialysis patients: A prospective study

Journal

BONE
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 332-337

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.06.002

Keywords

CKD-MBD; Peritoneal dialysis; Observational study; Cardiovascular calcification; Survival; Phosphorus

Funding

  1. Amgen Dompe S.p.A., Italy
  2. Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Zug, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Patients on dialysis may have abnormal serum levels of Ca, P and parathyroid hormone, with related bone diseases. This population has an increased risk of death, with cardiovascular calcification (CC) a contributing factor. Patients on peritoneal dialysis appear to be at increased risk of hyperlipidemia, a contributing factor to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Although several studies have described the presence and progression of CC in hemodialysis populations, there are fewer data in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Study design: The Renal Osteodystrophy and Calcifications: Key factors in Peritoneal Dialysis (ROCK-PD) study was a 36-month, prospective observational study conducted in Italy. The study examined the presence and progression of CC in two cardiac valves and five arterial sites. The potential associations of serum Ca and P with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity, demographic, clinical and blood chemistry variables was investigated. Results: CC was present in 77% of patients at baseline (N=369) and in 90% of patients by study end (N=145), progressing in 73% of patients. There were 42 deaths (11%). Analyses showed a marked correlation between baseline P levels and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy. However, there were no consistent correlations between serum Ca or P with mortality or morbidity. Conclusions: CC was common in peritoneal dialysis patients and progressed in a majority of patients. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available