4.6 Article

Impaired neutrophil directional chemotactic accuracy in chronic periodontitis patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 1-11

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12326

Keywords

chemoattractant; chemotaxis; neutrophil; periodontitis; treatment

Funding

  1. Birmingham and the Black Country Comprehensive Local Research Network (NIHR UKCRN) [10318]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Cancer Research UK [15672, 22311] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [1090325] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo investigate the chemotactic accuracy of peripheral blood neutrophils from patients with chronic periodontitis compared with matched healthy controls, before and after non-surgical periodontal therapy. Material & MethodsNeutrophils were isolated from patients and controls (n=18) by density centrifugation. Using the Insall chamber and video microscopy, neutrophils were analysed for directional chemotaxis towards N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine [fMLP (10nM), or CXCL8 (200ng/ml)]. Circular statistics were utilized for the analysis of cell movement. ResultsPrior to treatment, neutrophils from patients with chronic periodontitis had significantly reduced speed, velocity and chemotactic accuracy compared to healthy controls for both chemoattractants. Following periodontal treatment, patient neutrophils continued to display reduced speed in response to both chemoattractants. However, velocity and accuracy were normalized for the weak chemoattractant CXCL8 while they remained significantly reduced for fMLP. ConclusionsChronic periodontitis is associated with reduced neutrophil chemotaxis, and this is only partially restored by successful treatment. Dysfunctional neutrophil chemotaxis may predispose patients with periodontitis to their disease by increasing tissue transit times, thus exacerbating neutrophil-mediated collateral host tissue damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available