4.6 Article

Parathyroid hormone and bisphosphonate have opposite effects on stress fracture repair

Journal

BONE
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages 235-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.015

Keywords

Stress fracture; Parathyroid hormone; Bisphosphonate; Intracortical bone remodeling; Fatigue loading; Fracture healing

Funding

  1. U. S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) [03351012]
  2. NASA [NNA04CD04G]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and alendronate (ALN) on stress fracture repair. Stress fractures were induced in the ulnae of female adult rats. Animals were treated daily with vehicle, PTH (40 mu g/kg) or alendronate (2 mu g/kg), respectively. Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of bilateral ulnae were measured at two, four and eight weeks following induction of stress fracture. Histology at the ulna midshaft was undertaken at 2 and 4 weeks and mechanical testing was done at 8 weeks after stress fracture. PTH increased BMC significantly by 7% at 4 weeks and BMD and BMC significantly by 10% and 7% at 8 weeks compared to the control. Alendronate did not change BMD or BMC in comparison with the control. PTH significantly stimulated bone formation by 114% at 2 weeks,, increased intracortical resorption area by 23% at 4 weeks, and enhanced the ultimate force of the affected ulnae by 15% at 8 weeks compared to the control. Alendronate significantly suppressed bone formation rate by 44% compared to the control at 4 weeks. These data indicate that PTH may accelerate intracortical bone remodeling induced by microdamage and alendronate may delay intracortical bone remodeling during stress fracture repair in rats. This study suggests that PTH may be used to facilitate stress fracture repair whereas bisphosphonates may delay tissue level repair of stress fractures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available