4.6 Article

Biological basis for the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia

Journal

BONE
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 780-788

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.044

Keywords

Bone marrow stromal cells; Bone; Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia; Type 1 neurofibromatosis

Funding

  1. Instituto Superiore di Sanita (Programma Italia-USA 'Malattie Rare')
  2. 'Io ci sono' Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study was designed to establish the biological basis for the use of autologous bone-marrow stromal cells (MSC) in order to improve the curing opportunities of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT). The investigation was planned by taking into account that the pathophysiology of bone healing mainly depends on the osteogenic potential of the resident cells, although several factors play a crucial role in restoring the normal bone structure. Bone marrow samples were collected from the lesion site (P) and the iliac crest (IC) of 7 patients affected by CPT and type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1+) and 6 patients affected by CPT without NF1 (NF1-). Four patients without CPT served as control group. Biochemical, functional and molecular assays showed that the ability to generate bone-forming cells was higher in IC-MSC than in P-MSC, but lower in CPT patients than in control group. We evaluated whether lost factors, such as autologous serum and the microenvironment surrounding the pseudarthrosis lesion, could impair the osteogenic differentiation of IC-MSC. Autologous serum was less effective than FBS in promoting the IC-MSC differentiation, but the damage was more evident in NF1- than in NF1+ patients. Additionally, the supernatant of osteoblast cultures obtained from bone fragments close to the lesion site favoured the differentiation of IC-MSC in NF1 patients. In summary, our results suggest that MSC trans plantation could be a promising strategy for the therapy of CPT. Further studies are warranted to confirm the clinical effectiveness in comparison to standard surgical treatment. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available