4.6 Article

Replication of the association of GLT6D1 with aggressive periodontitis in a Sudanese population

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 319-324

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12375

Keywords

Africans; aggressive periodontitis; gene polymorphism

Funding

  1. Colgate Europe GmbH
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/14/9/30632] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Public Health Agency [RRG/3282/05] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundSusceptibility to aggressive periodontitis (AgP) is influenced by genetic as well as environmental factors. Studies linking gene variants to AgP have been mainly centred in developed countries with limited data from Africa. AimTo investigate whether previously reported candidate gene associations with AgP could be replicated in a population from Sudan. MethodsThe investigation was a case-control design. Cases with AgP (n=132) and controls (n=136) were identified from patients attending the Periodontal Department in Khartoum Dental Hospital. Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Analysis focused on gene variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF)>25% in the Sudanese subjects that had previously been reported to be associated with AgP. ResultsOne candidate gene rs1537415 (GLT6D1) was significantly associated with AgP, OR=1.50 (95% CI 1.04-2.17), p=0.0295 (increasing to p=0.09 after correction for multiple testing). The association strengthened to OR=1.56 (95% CI 1.15-2.16), p=0.0042 when the controls were supplemented with data from the Hap map for the Yoruba in Ibadan (n=147) and remained significant (p=0.013) after correction for multiple testing. ConclusionThe study independently replicated the finding that rs1537415, a variant in glycosyl transferase gene GLT6D1, is associated with AgP and provided the first report of genetic associations with AgP in a Sudanese population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available